How to Build CHD@ZJU

CHD related Articles were retrieved from Pubmed, by entering keywords "coronary heart disease" and constrict the publish date from 2000/1/1 to now (2013/1/23). As a result, totally 115898 articles were found and their abstracts were downloaded for text mining. Since some articles didn't contain abstracts, only 88396 abstracts remained.
The text-mining process to get CHD related genes could be divided in to 5 following steps:

  • 1) Extracting all keywords from abstracts and ignoring those keywords start with numbers. 101402 keywords were extracted.

    •
  • 2) Input these keywords into Gene library in ArrayTrack and find possible related genes. 4674 genes were then found.

  • 3) Put these 4674 genes again into pubmed abstracts to find related aticles. Only genes which offical name or there keyword description (such as prolactin for gene PRL) could be found in the abstract would be remained. As a result, 1247 genes were remained.

    •
  • 4) Manually examined on the 1247 genes to validate it was acutally related to CHD. Some genes would be filtered if it represents other meanings (such as gene CAD, Entrez ID:790, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, is mostly meant coronary arterial disease in articles). 681 genes were then validated with at least one reference.

  • 5) All genes was compared with 1078 CHD genes in RGD database, and 370 genes were overlapped. These 370 genes were labels as "RGD_Supported" and the other 293 genes were labels as "REFERED". All 663 genes had supported references in CHD@ZJU which were examined by step 4.

    • How To contact Us

    Collaboration Information: Prof. Xiaohui Fan (fanxh@zju.edu.cn)

    Website using assistance : Leihong Wu (11019004@zju.edu.cn)




    HDL and CETP Inhibition: Will This DEFINE the Future?
  • Author:"Davidson, Michael H"

  • Published Year:2012

  • Journal:Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine

  • Abstract:"OPINION STATEMENT: The premature stopping of the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health) study due to futility has called into question the clinical value of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increases. The failure of estrogen therapy in the HERS (Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study) trial and the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors torcetrapib (in the ILLUMINATE [Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand Its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events] trial) and, most recently, dalcetrapib in the dal-OUTCOMES trial has cast doubt on the ""HDL-raising hypothesis"" for providing additional benefits on top of statin therapy. The AIM-HIGH trial was designed to equalize low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between the two treatment groups while the niacin arm would have a higher HDL-C. The study population included patients with low HDL-C and cardiovascular disease (CVD); because this population has a high residual risk for CVD on statin therapy, these patients were most likely to benefit from the niacin HDL-C-raising effect. These findings are disappointing because clinicians have used extended-release niacin to treat patients with low HDL-C because niacin has demonstrated benefit in earlier reported studies in conjunction with statins and other drugs, as observed in the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study (CLAS) and the HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (HATS). In the Coronary Drug Project, niacin alone was shown to reduce myocardial infarction, stroke, and the need for coronary bypass surgery. Niacin does not increase the number of HDL particles to the same extent it raises HDL-C. Niacin alters the composition of HDL, making the particle larger, which is similar to the effects of CETP inhibition on HDL. Both niacin and CETP inhibitors decrease the catabolism of HDL, thereby increasing the size of the HDL particle and raising HDL-C. Dalcetrapib, which does not decrease LDL-C while raising HDL-C, was recently discontinued from clinical development due to a interim analysis that determined that the study was futile. Anacetrapib, which markedly increases HDL-C while also significantly lowering LDL-C, remains in clinical development, with a large cardiovascular end point trial currently enrolling 30,000 high-risk patients. For now, the goal remains the achievement of LDL-C and non-HDL targets, and low HDL-c remains a significant independent risk factor, but there is insufficient evidence that raising HDL-C will provide a clinical benefit."

  • 10.1007/s11936-012-0191-8

    • |Click to search this paper in PubMed|   | back to gene page|